As we watch the news we know that our United States Senate
has passed a committee vote in support of some type of intervention in
Syria. At this point the House
probably does not have the votes to support an attack. If we remember the recent
history of bills passed by our Congress it appears we, or rather our elected
leaders, have a bad habit of not always knowing what is in any legislation they
passed. We are now only learning how overbearing Obamacare will be, even the
pro-Obama unions are screaming in pain.
The recent exploits of the NSA and the IRS are other examples of
Washington making up their own rules as they go. And we still remember Benghazi
and the gun-giveaway to thugs in Mexico.
The only thing that we do know is that Syria is a mess and
right now it does not affect the United States. If you argue that we know of
the mass killings of people by a chemical weapon and that it demonstrates a
level of barbarism that no rational nation should turn its head from then I
will agree with that premise. The chemical attack deserves global condemnation. I have previously argued that we should be giving
only food and medical supplies and I stand by that statement. Peggy Noonan
writes a very good article where she articulates that the American people do
not want any more military involvement in that part of the troubled world (full
article here). At this point our government needs to listen to the people and
let President Obama blame whomever he chooses for the infamous red line remark.
But what we are quickly finding out is what may be the
results of any attack on Syria. Intercepted messages indicate that Iran wants
our embassies to be attacked (here) in the Middle East. Russia has moved
warships into the vicinity and Israel can expect a retaliation of rockets and
mortars, or worse. And the worst result could be the actual toppling of the al
Assad government. Then we will see what Senator McCain’s freedom fighters are
really like.
No comments:
Post a Comment